Understanding Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) in Next.js

I recently wrote about reducing Vercel Fast Origin Transfer by 95% using ISR, but after diving deep into that implementation, I realized there's significant confusion in the developer community about what ISR actually is. Many developers think ISR is another rendering strategy like SSR or CSR, when it's actually something quite different - a smart caching strategy that enhances Static Site Generation.

This confusion leads to poor architectural decisions and missed optimization opportunities. After implementing ISR for my own blog and helping other developers understand the differences, I want to clarify exactly what ISR is, how it differs from other approaches, and when you should use it. By the end of this guide, you'll understand the fundamental distinction between rendering strategies and caching strategies, and know exactly when ISR is the right choice for your project.

ISR Is Not a Rendering Type

The biggest misconception about Incremental Static Regeneration is that it's a rendering strategy alongside Server-Side Rendering (SSR), Client-Side Rendering (CSR), and Static Site Generation (SSG). This misunderstanding stems from how ISR is often presented in documentation and tutorials.

ISR is actually a caching strategy that enhances Static Site Generation. When you use ISR, you're still using SSG - you're just adding intelligent cache invalidation on top of it. Your pages are still generated as static HTML files, but now you can update specific pages without rebuilding your entire site.

Here's the key distinction: rendering strategies determine how and when your HTML is generated, while caching strategies determine how long that generated content remains valid and when it gets refreshed.

// File: app/blog/[slug]/page.tsx
// This is still SSG - the rendering strategy hasn't changed
export const revalidate = 604800 // This is the caching strategy

export async function generateStaticParams() {
  // SSG: Generate static HTML at build time
  const posts = await fetch('/api/posts').then(res => res.json())
  return posts.map(post => ({ slug: post.slug }))
}

export default async function BlogPost({ params }) {
  // This runs at build time for SSG, just like before
  const post = await fetch(`/api/posts/${params.slug}`)
  return <article>{post.content}</article>
}

The revalidate configuration doesn't change how the page renders - it's still static HTML generated at build time. Instead, it adds a layer of cache management that allows Next.js to regenerate specific pages when needed.

The Four Core Rendering Strategies

To understand where ISR fits, let's clarify the actual rendering strategies available in Next.js and when each makes sense.

Static Site Generation (SSG) generates all pages as HTML files at build time. These files are served directly from CDNs with no server processing required. SSG provides the fastest possible page loads but requires rebuilding the entire site to update any content.

// File: app/about/page.tsx
// Pure SSG - no revalidate, content never changes
export default async function AboutPage() {
  const content = await fetch('/api/about').then(res => res.json())
  return <main>{content.body}</main>
}

Server-Side Rendering (SSR) generates HTML on the server for every request. This provides fresh data on every page load but requires server processing time, resulting in higher latency and server costs.

// File: app/dashboard/page.tsx  
export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic' // Forces SSR

export default async function Dashboard() {
  // This runs on every request
  const userData = await fetch('/api/user/current').then(res => res.json())
  return <div>Welcome back, {userData.name}</div>
}

Client-Side Rendering (CSR) sends minimal HTML to the browser and loads content via JavaScript after the page loads. This approach works well for interactive applications but provides slower initial page loads and SEO challenges.

// File: app/profile/page.tsx
'use client'

export default function ProfilePage() {
  const [profile, setProfile] = useState(null)
  
  useEffect(() => {
    // Runs in the browser after page load
    fetch('/api/profile').then(res => res.json()).then(setProfile)
  }, [])
  
  return profile ? <div>{profile.name}</div> : <div>Loading...</div>
}

Partial Prerendering (PPR) combines static shells with dynamic content streams. The static portions are cached while dynamic sections are generated on-demand. This is Next.js's newest rendering strategy for applications that need both performance and freshness.

Each strategy has clear use cases: SSG for content that rarely changes, SSR for personalized or frequently changing data, CSR for highly interactive applications, and PPR for modern applications that need both static performance and dynamic content.

ISR: Smart SSG with Selective Rebuilding

Incremental Static Regeneration takes the performance benefits of SSG and adds the ability to update content without full site rebuilds. When you implement ISR, you're still using Static Site Generation - you're just adding smart cache invalidation.

The power of ISR becomes apparent when you compare traditional SSG workflows with ISR-enabled workflows. With traditional SSG, updating a single blog post requires regenerating every page on your site, which can take minutes for large sites. With ISR, you can update just the changed content while leaving everything else cached.

// File: app/blog/[slug]/page.tsx
export const revalidate = 604800 // 7 days - safety net for automatic refresh

export async function generateStaticParams() {
  // Still SSG - generates static pages at build time
  const posts = await fetch('/api/posts').then(res => res.json())
  return posts.map(post => ({ slug: post.slug }))
}

export default async function BlogPost({ params }) {
  // Generated at build time, cached indefinitely until revalidated
  const post = await fetch(`/api/posts/${params.slug}`)
  return (
    <article>
      <h1>{post.title}</h1>
      <div>{post.content}</div>
    </article>
  )
}

This configuration generates static HTML for all blog posts at build time, exactly like traditional SSG. The difference is the revalidate setting, which tells Next.js that these static pages can be refreshed after 7 days if someone visits them.

The real magic happens with on-demand revalidation. Instead of waiting for the time-based revalidation, you can trigger updates immediately when content changes.

// File: app/api/revalidate/route.ts
import { revalidatePath } from 'next/cache'

export async function POST(request) {
  const { postSlug } = await request.json()
  
  // Regenerate only the specific blog post that changed
  revalidatePath(`/blog/${postSlug}`)
  revalidatePath('/blog') // Update blog listing too
  
  return Response.json({ revalidated: true })
}

When your CMS triggers this webhook after content updates, only the affected pages are regenerated. Your site remains static and fast, but content stays fresh without the overhead of full rebuilds.

ISR vs Data Caching: Different Layers

Another common confusion is between ISR and Next.js data caching features like unstable_cache and the upcoming "use cache" directive. These operate at different layers of your application and solve different problems.

ISR operates at the route level - it determines when entire pages are regenerated as static HTML files. Data caching operates at the function level - it determines when individual data fetches are refreshed.

// File: app/blog/page.tsx
// Route-level caching with ISR
export const revalidate = 3600 // Regenerate entire page after 1 hour

// Function-level caching for data
const getCachedPosts = unstable_cache(
  async () => {
    return await fetch('/api/posts').then(res => res.json())
  },
  ['posts'],
  { revalidate: 1800 } // Cache this data for 30 minutes
)

export default async function BlogListing() {
  const posts = await getCachedPosts() // Uses cached data for 30 minutes
  
  return (
    <div>
      {posts.map(post => (
        <article key={post.id}>
          <h2>{post.title}</h2>
          <p>{post.excerpt}</p>
        </article>
      ))}
    </div>
  )
}

In this example, the blog listing page is regenerated as a static HTML file every hour (ISR), but the actual posts data is cached for 30 minutes (data caching). If someone visits the page after 35 minutes, they'll get the cached static HTML (from ISR), but the posts data will be refetched because its cache expired.

You can use both strategies together for maximum efficiency. ISR handles the expensive HTML generation process, while data caching handles individual API calls or database queries within your components.

The key distinction is scope: ISR invalidates and regenerates entire pages, while data caching invalidates and refetches specific data points within those pages.

When ISR Makes Sense

ISR shines in specific scenarios where you need static performance but occasional content updates. The sweet spot is content-heavy sites with infrequent updates - exactly what blogs, documentation sites, and marketing pages represent.

For a blog publishing 1-2 posts per week, ISR provides static HTML performance for the 99% of content that doesn't change, while enabling immediate updates for the 1% that does. Your 100 existing blog posts remain cached at CDN edges worldwide, while only new posts or updated content trigger regeneration.

E-commerce product catalogs represent another ideal use case. Most products don't change frequently, but when prices or availability updates occur, you want those changes reflected immediately without rebuilding thousands of product pages.

Documentation sites benefit enormously from ISR. Technical documentation changes sporadically, but when updates happen, they need to be accurate immediately. ISR allows you to maintain static performance while ensuring critical updates are reflected without delay.

However, ISR isn't appropriate for every scenario. Highly dynamic content like social media feeds, real-time dashboards, or user-specific pages should use SSR or CSR. If your content changes multiple times per hour, the overhead of constant regeneration negates ISR's benefits.

Similarly, if your content truly never changes - like legal pages or company history - pure SSG without revalidation is simpler and more efficient than ISR.

Implementation Patterns

The most effective ISR implementations combine time-based revalidation as a safety net with on-demand revalidation for immediate updates. This hybrid approach ensures content freshness even if webhook systems fail while providing instant updates when everything works correctly.

// File: app/products/[id]/page.tsx
export const revalidate = 86400 // 24 hours as fallback

export async function generateStaticParams() {
  const products = await fetch('/api/products').then(res => res.json())
  return products.map(product => ({ id: product.id }))
}

export default async function ProductPage({ params }) {
  const product = await fetch(`/api/products/${params.id}`)
  
  return (
    <div>
      <h1>{product.name}</h1>
      <p>Price: ${product.price}</p>
      <p>In Stock: {product.inventory} units</p>
    </div>
  )
}

This configuration generates static pages for all products at build time, then relies on daily revalidation to catch any missed updates. For immediate updates, implement webhook-triggered revalidation.

// File: app/api/revalidate/product/route.ts
export async function POST(request) {
  const { productId } = await request.json()
  
  revalidatePath(`/products/${productId}`)
  revalidatePath('/products') // Update product listing
  
  return Response.json({ success: true })
}

When product prices or inventory change in your system, trigger this endpoint to update only the affected pages immediately. The majority of your product catalog remains cached and fast, while updated products reflect changes instantly.

For content management workflows, consider implementing tag-based revalidation for more granular control. This approach allows you to update related content efficiently when changes occur.

// File: app/blog/[slug]/page.tsx
export default async function BlogPost({ params }) {
  const post = await fetch(`/api/posts/${params.slug}`, {
    next: { tags: [`post-${params.slug}`, 'posts'] }
  })
  
  return <article>{post.content}</article>
}

// In your webhook handler
revalidateTag(`post-${slug}`) // Updates specific post
revalidateTag('posts') // Updates all post-related pages

This pattern provides surgical precision for content updates while maintaining the performance benefits of static generation.

Conclusion

Incremental Static Regeneration isn't a rendering strategy - it's a smart caching layer that enhances Static Site Generation. By understanding ISR as "SSG with selective rebuilding," you can make better architectural decisions and implement more efficient caching strategies.

The key insight is recognizing the difference between rendering (how pages are generated) and caching (how long they stay valid). ISR keeps your pages static for performance while adding intelligent cache invalidation for content freshness. This combination provides the best of both worlds: CDN-level performance with content management flexibility.

For content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, and product catalogs, ISR offers a compelling solution. You get static performance for the majority of content that doesn't change, with immediate updates for the small percentage that does. The result is better user experience, lower server costs, and simplified deployment workflows.

Let me know in the comments if you have questions about implementing ISR in your projects, and subscribe for more practical development guides.

Thanks, Matija

Understanding Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) in Next.js

⚡ Next.js Implementation Guides

Related Posts: